Meta
» About
It is a weakness of website owners that they scan their statistics. Actually having about ten sites I don't peek that often and then my motivation is lovely lucre.
But this is a new site (only for about six weeks despite what the sidebar currently says) and a very personal one so I've seen just about every single referral.
Bernard Montorgueil’s odder side. Think I remember a similar Eric Stanton scenario.
I have three stats packages working. Their reports differ.
From the program that only shows keywords and not key phrases I see there's a huge search for slaves going on. With a slight bias for those looking for male slaves. Lot sof you seem to be focusing on your testicles. Well, guys, it isn't as if I don't understand. And perhaps when Alexandra gets back there'll be more for you (ouch!).
Another - it knows key phrases as well as words - shows that my sjambok purchase has generated far too many hits for something that has been employed against my body only a couple of times and not yet harshly (darn!).
The last shows lots of searches for a "part time male slave." I don't blame you. Having a slave underfoot all the time must be a bother (feet, bless their inexhaustible joy, are popular as well).
After that I see searches for art and the usual Femdom clichés.
The only odd thing about the referrals is that they are largely relevant. My other sites, most with far more traffic, get lots of irrelevant hits. While I'm sure many if not most who arrive here don't see what they were looking for at least we're in the same neighborhood.
BTW, you folks there on Live Journal. If you are going to visit so often why don't you leave a comment or two?
