Lifestyle, Part of Life or ... ?
» BDSM, D/s, S&M: Speculations
I've read the pre-web usenet BDSM newsgroups on and off for years. Irregularly active on a number of forums. Read a fairly largish group of BDSM blogs.
The collective ethos and individual self-perceptions vary considerably. The collective places on the web aren't something that I want to risk offering generalities about. Though usenet remains the most sophisticated (despite the nitwits).
Depending on the venue, which people are currently active and my own mood there are times I feel that I've wandered into an alien place. Or am among neighbors I'd meet for coffee. A few might even be close friends in meat space if distance didn't separate us.
Maybe you feel up to sharing with this nosey fellow how D/s, S&M (choose your favorite acroynym) fits into your relationships, overall tenor of your life - something along those lines. (Or even how you wish it could.)
My list of possible options is necessarily arbitrary. To hit upon ever possible option would be an exercise in excess. Let us say:
- 24/7 Lifestyle
- Basis of your relationships
- Important but not pervasive
- Simply one form of play
- Fun but very minor
- None of the above
- I can't decide
Obviously there's no possible statistical validity to this. It is a friendly game, exercise in curiosity. Maybe you'll even have to reflect a bit and consider your answer. Nor do I suggest you should feel really limited by my list. My goal is only to prompt your thinking.
Can I coax you into sharing with me?



Comments
I’ve been puzzling over how to answer this one all afternoon. It’s sort of, kind of, important. At least to me. But we’re not really practicing anything in particular, nor are we even talking about anything sexual lately. Not that we’re avoiding anything (I hope), but because we’ve had a few straight weeks of family and work obligations that are burning us out.
Fun, but minor?
The Edge of Vanilla
Posted by: Tom Allen | September 15, 2006 8:47 PM
When Alexandra and I first started talking it seemed to slip about a bit. And still does, mostly because we aren’t able to be together without interruption.
For us it is a very important but not (yet) pervasive form of fun.
Posted by: Richard | September 16, 2006 6:13 AM
You don’t leave any choice for “mixture of the above.”
With my pet, D/s is the basis of our relationship.
With my husband, BDSM is one thing we do together. Not very often, of late.
I feel very fortunate to have a husband who is comfortable letting me keep a toy on the side. He gets a little impatient with the pup sometimes, but has been known to contribute the occasional fiendish idea.
Posted by: R | September 17, 2006 11:44 PM
You’ll have to forgive me for forgetting about polyamorous possibilities.
And you rarely expect anyone to say a description matches them even when it does.
Are your husband and pet sometime in the same place? (If that isn’t being too nosey.)
Posted by: Richard | September 18, 2006 6:48 AM
For us, it’s a 24/7 lifestyle. I am always hers to command, and there are no scene markers that delineate when we go into and out of “play” mode.
As you may have guessed, at one point in my relationship with Mistress Laura, the dynamic was reversed.
I consider myself firmly submissive now, but know that I contain every aspect. This gives me an interesting perspective, and a sense of the… arbitrariness… of all roles and expectations.
Best regards, Thomas.
Posted by: Mistress Laura's boy | September 18, 2006 1:42 PM
I think it is great to be able to have that kind of insight and perspective and in no way detracts from the reality of our D/s relationships.
Posted by: Richard | September 18, 2006 2:14 PM
(in response to your response)
My husband, my pet and I all participate in an amateur theater group. (That’s what I call it at work; the truth is we’re Rocky Horror idiots.) The interaction between the two of them is limited pretty much to preparations for the show, the show itself, and meeting afterwards at a 24 hour diner. Due to the action of the film, they do interact fairly closely during the show (my husband’s character actually seduces my pet’s character), and among my pet’s standing orders are to treat my husband, as indeed any member of my family, with the utmost respect.
I regret that my husband isn’t fonder of my pet; he and my last pet were friends, but we’d all known each other before there was any question of ownership. He did not like my previous lover either, although he was tolerant to the point that he accepted participating in a threesome to make me happy. (He has made it quite clear that he isn’t willing to do that with the current pet.)
I think it would be wonderful to keep a pet or a houseboy around the house, but don’t believe my husband would ever accept it. I regret this, but am deeply grateful for what I have. My husband is my darling and he can be a very kinky little bunny, but for him, getting down on his knees will never be more than something that he knows makes the wife happy. It doesn’t mean anything more to him.
Posted by: R | September 20, 2006 11:14 AM
This makes me feel so sexually unevolved. I might’ve spared myself many problems had polyamory had been a clearly presented option when I was younger.
Posted by: Richard | September 20, 2006 12:49 PM
Hmmm… for myself It’s between Important and pervasive to Basis of your relationships. At least love relationships.
Posted by: Randi Triellis (SL) | August 26, 2009 1:05 PM