Exploring Orgasm Denial
» Chastity , » Humbling , » Worship & ecstasy
An attempt to capture a picture of my mind at this exact moment in time.
The stallion guard arrived and I’ll be testing it so I can see if it will work for penis confinement. This is the large version and I still wish it were just a tiny bit bigger - maybe an eighth if an inch more in diameter.
It fits. Erectile pain will be fine (desired) but mere irritation won’t be. That would leave me irritated, which is hardly the goal. And I need to check this device against the similar penis cage that we got some months back. (This seems to allow easier insertion but nothing is better than the empirical approach.)
You may be thinking: that is easily escaped. I won’t deny that my imagination is stirred by the image of an implacable metal container. Maybe later. The device is as much a symbol as anything. My word of honor should bind me. Not that I don’t feel a little envy for the latest developments in aspirant’s life.
Quick summary for new readers: my first impressions of enforced (the force being her wish) chastity were strongly negative.I had to rid my mind of much sexist clutter that is often associated with orgasm denial play. If you really want to understand my initial responses read the Chastity Archives.
Eventually thanks to people who do this with a committed partner I became able to grasp much of the power of penis confinement and orgasm denial. I made a short-lived stab at it but our relationship really wasn’t ready for the experience at the time.
As I’ll explain later penis confinement tends to focus my imagination more than just chastity and denial: of course it isn’t so neatly subdivided.
Understanding instructs empathy and with me it led to desire. (Alexandra, I don’t think I ever told you this but you know that I make a vice of fearing to be a pest.) A locked cock went from seeming an absurdity to a fervent fantasy. I entertained the most clichéd images of an aloof beautiful woman whose only interest in me was mocking my never to be fulfilled desire of her body. (Which for reasons I can’t grasp - and blush to admit - tended to focus on lingerie model Alley Baggett.)
Naturally I fantasized the extreme of permanent orgasm denial. Or being told I’d be allowed on only when I became a completely pleasing slave. Or only on my birthday. Any man who has come to grasp this kind of surrender probably goes down the same imaginary path.
The bound phallus seem to embody so many things: servile need, bondage, suffering, humiliation: the last in being reduced to a creature defined by frustrated lust. Becoming an object in a way through my own objectification of another.
There’s an oxymoronic hilarity in giving yourself an orgasm while imagining being forbidden one.
Penis confinement: even though D/s does not pervade our relationship I’ve often wished I could have some mark that says I’m hers. A token of Alexandra’s ownership. What could be a clearer proof of my hidden role as her property than the binding of my sexuality?
But I’m not always Alexandra’s plaything. We need to be wary of our boundaries.
Then came the day she casually expressed an interest in keeping me chaste. Honestly, my heart leapt to my throat. Once again she was willing to take something I’d longed to offer. D/s isn’t required to appreciate the epiphany of a complementary desire on the part of the beloved.
As with the beginning of many journeys there’s no way to know where it will lead. Perhaps we’ll decide it isn’t worth the effort or the right path for us.
One of my fears, and this may seem odd, is that if told “No” I’ll simply accept it. That is in being denied sexual expression I’ll stop wanting it. My sexuality is complaisant and adaptable. Without frustration I’m not sure either of us would feel fulfilled. But I’m excited by Alexandra’s person as well as her persona.
More experienced men have said the only danger is if the loved one loses interest in you. I can’t imagine Alexandra’s passionate nature diminishing. Indeed knowing that my pleasure in her skin and scent has new power over me may heighten it.
She’ll touch me; I’ll kiss her. My body will try to respond only to find itself forbidden by bands of metal.
What am I hoping to achieve in losing the freedom to manipulate my penis at will?
While she’s been away I’ve learned how yearning for her nearness makes me alive to my submissiveness. It does hurt but often sweetly. Each pang refreshes in my mind how lovely it can be to crawl to her. My head bowed waiting for the reward of her touch.
While I know that a large part of me must always remain independent and free there’s also a the desire to more freely offer my surrender to the degree that she wishes to have it. I’m too realistic to think that penis imprisonment will knock me into 24/7 slavishness. (Which we wouldn’t want.) But it may enable me to tap into it more readily. This may not even be a form of play we’ll always engage in but a means of helping me adapt. Not point in fretting too much about the morrow. It will come and be full of surprises.
For how long should I be thus confined? Who knows? We’ll incline our hearts and listen for the subtle signals that only two people in love can hear. Duration is merely a quantity. The outcome is a quality.
This is a mutual exploration of possibilities. She wouldn’t seek if I weren’t able to offer it. I wouldn’t ask her to accept it if she weren’t happy to.
Given my last relationship it may even prove to be a form of healing.
Whatever the outcome we’ll learn more about one another. One of the joys of love.


Comments
Best of luck, Richard.
I indulge in orgasm denial, but have never done so with hardware. I would be very disappointed in a man who needed the hardware to obey, but there is a certain romance to it.
I was first pointed to a chastity site by a former pet, as a possible solution to his body’s having circumvented my ban on his orgasms.
It was really touching. It struck me mostly in the “even this I would do for you” category (he was good at that).
I have thought long enough about this that I think I know what type I’d use (I lean towards the CB3000). I don’t think I will any time soon; my current pet starts sublimating his sexual energy after about 4 days of deprivation, and of course that’s counter to the intent.
Posted by: R | February 28, 2006 1:57 PM
When I first thought of this last year it was really the idea of her will and my body causing pain that inflamed me. And that it is a form of physical restraint. There is plenty of masochistic romance to that for me.
The devices we’d use now are easily escaped. So honor on my part is required. If she were to just say don’t my rather odd sexuality might simply neuter me. At least to some degree. The pain and bondage should prevent that (I hope).
I’m following aspirant’s new CB 3000 with interest. I’ve read (on Orgasm Denial I think) that the Curve may be better for uncircumcised men. Should we eventually progress to something like one of those my response to that level of penis bondage will be … not sure how to sum it up.
I’m not sure if I know what you mean about sublimating? Usually when I hear that in connection with sexual denial it means channeling the frustration into something creative.
Posted by: Richard | February 28, 2006 2:12 PM
I don’t what he’s sublimating that energy into, but after about 4 days it drops off markedly and he stops wanting.
I think of sublimation as simply a change of state; it’s the engineer in me. (Webster’s proposes: “to divert the expression of (an instinctual desire or impulse) from its primitive form to one that is considered more socially or culturally acceptable.”) Perhaps it is similar to the neutering you mentioned you fear.
Posted by: R | February 28, 2006 6:09 PM
My sense of it I think comes from psychoanalysis. It was once popular to explain artistic production as the product of sexual frustration.
From what I’ve read on Orgasm Denial feeling asexual does happen in chastity scenarios. Some guys say that teasing is needed to make it effective. This is involuntary I imagine and there’s nothing he can do about it. Now a chastity device where he mails you the key might make it exciting. (One option is to put the key in a key safe and mail that back to him. But not give him the combination until you are ready. Though that would require mailing the little safe back and forth. Just stretching for a suggestion.)
I put on the stallion guard a few hours ago. At first I was so lost in submissive feelings all I could do was see myself kneeling before Alexandra rubbing my cheek against her leg and saying “thank you” over and over again.
But I put it on of my own volition and she’s away so that didn’t last.
Some of the guys on Orgasm Denial do lots of long distance chastity so they might have a suggestion or two about keeping your pet’s response more keen.
Posted by: Richard | February 28, 2006 6:20 PM
i don’t know which is worse a chastitity device that allows me to partially erect or one that constains me to the little chipolata I am.
Posted by: Lou Rolls | March 4, 2006 3:59 AM
A fairly smart guy who has been shifted to a smaller device seems to feel that barely being able to become erect at all is less painful.
Probably varies from man to man.
I’d suspect that a device that permitted a full erection but no way to touch it would evoke a very strong response in me emotionally.
Posted by: Richard | March 4, 2006 6:13 AM
I really like your Blog! It’s very interesting!
We in Argentina are making a Femdom Blog about Orgasm Denial tecnics in Spanish. We are in the proyect of difund all those new ideas. Thanks for all, Cristian.
Posted by: Cristian from Buenos Aires | November 15, 2006 2:04 PM