Would You Force Your Son to Wear a CB6000?
» Emotional Health
Destiny smears spicy cheese on chance’s genitals. Eileen whips May until his back is bloody. I like to lick mud off boots. But it is always the people who use the phrase female led relationships that come out with the really weird stuff.
This morning I read a blog post by a man that stated his son will be raised to submit to his girlfriends and his future wife (maybe he’ll grow up to be gay).<./p>
And possibly his son will be made to wear a chastity device. Since the wife is the commander-in-chief of the household that will ultimately be her decision.
I don’t know if this is another fantasy blog but I can’t deny this did strike me as depraved. Child rearing shouldn’t involve inculcating parental fetishes and kinks. Nor should a boy’s youthful sexuality be thwarted.
Link not provided by intent.




Comments
Peoples’ stupidity continues to amaze me. This is wrong on so many levels. What a shlub.
If this is real, I hope the kid grows up to be dominant, finds a great relationship, and rubs it in his parents’ faces.
Posted by: roo-roo | December 23, 2007 4:44 PM
As a child i was sexually molested, introduced very early to the pleasures of the flesh. As a parent i felt that push to introduce my own children early on to the joy sex can bring. BUT i didn’t, i understood that it was their choice to come to sex when they were ready for it. They will discover their own kinks independently.
Posted by: would rather not say | December 23, 2007 8:01 PM
This sounds like a fantasy blog. i certainly hope it is. i am a steadfast believer in the right of a Dominant to demand chastity from a subject, and to enforce it rigorously, but i cannot countenance the involvement of minors in BDSM, in any manner, including observers being educated.
Posted by: tamehorse | December 23, 2007 9:27 PM
I’m with tamehorse - I ran across this blog earlier this week and it has some aspects of the “I’m really in a femdom relationship. See? My wife humiliates me in front of her girlfriends and everything!” kind of writing we’ve seen several times around teh intertubez.
That said, the CB3000 Yahoo group closed down for a week last year when some idiot started posting how boys should be put in devices. Some people have a difficult time with that fantasy/reality line thingie.
That said, the idea of raising one’s children to be subs or slaves seems to violate a couple of Starfleet directives, not the least of which would be the one about “safe, sane, & consensual.”
Posted by: Tom Allen | December 24, 2007 3:00 PM
Oh my god, Tom, you are such a geek! It’s awesome! Yay Starfleet!
Posted by: maymay | December 25, 2007 2:19 AM
Yeah, I knew it might well be a fantasy blog.
But I’ve seen some serious discussion in instilling FLR and LFA ‘values’ in children elsewhere and had been meaning to bring it up.
Posted by: Richard | December 29, 2007 3:55 PM
That is unbelievably fucked up. Any kid that had that done to them would end up irreparably messed up in the head. I sure as hell hope that’s a fantasy blog, becuase it’s a scary thought that people might actually considering doing such things to their kids.
Posted by: AlmostMagic | December 30, 2007 3:14 PM
that is so seriously fucked up…You need a license for most things in this world, unfortunately raising children, any dick head can do with high sperm count. I hope for the child’s sake it was fantasy. I’m raising three young boys that idea sickens me.
Posted by: MissBonnie | January 4, 2008 5:51 AM
No. Definitely no. I wil not force my son to wear a CB6000.
Posted by: Mistress Asher | January 7, 2008 7:20 AM
I used to know a woman who, as part of her service, bore a child for her husband. She got pregnant, had a natural childbirth, and breastfed. She’d glare at the child as she fed it, so resentful of him, she hated having done this, of having been made to go through the pain, to be the caretaker for a child. She didn’t like children, she didn’t want them. She cared for her son as part of her service to her husband — and I’ve always thought that was a horrible, cruel thing to do to the chlid.
Posted by: Mary | January 8, 2008 1:35 AM
Disgusting.
Posted by: Afterthefall | January 10, 2008 10:37 PM
Yes,
If his penis is small and he has a pretty face, i think every boy should be fitted with a CB, though i’m not sure which one, after his first ejaculation and with feminisation.
Posted by: diane | February 17, 2008 3:21 PM
I believe that the content is for adults ONLY! Children do not need to be subject nor should they to ADULT fantasies and whims. There is a reason they call it ADULT entertainment.
I have known a couple of households that use the example of D/s in their homes with their children…and this idea doesn’t strike Me badly because it is simply a dynamic of relationships in the households. It’s the physical and sexual parts that need be kept from children. We put them here on this earth, they are our future…we need to respect them and teach them the truth but all in due time and NEVER impede upon their being in a sexual way. That is so perverse I cannot even begin to say.
Posted by: Mistress Jade | September 16, 2011 2:13 AM
doing that kind of thing at any age below 15 is a bit nuts-if nothing eles teach all male to respect women but making them wear the chastity devices is a bit too far-breaking the teaching meathods of todays society YES but the devices-NO
Posted by: m.early | May 12, 2012 10:20 AM
If — for the sake of discussion — parents really want to orient their children to gender domination, this may be the way to go (example for creating a bias toward female domination):
The father practices and demonstrates submission to the mother, and any female children, sisters of the young male) from birth. The exact limits and protocols need to be worked ut carefully by the mother and father.
Similarly, the daughters should see, from their earliest memories, that father, a male, is submissive to mother, as the natural way that males behave. At some age (worked out by the parents in advance — perhaps about six? when they can start to understand what’s happening) the parents include the daughters in the female domination pattern.
The son[s] should be indoctrinated from birth, so the idea of submission to female authority is totally ingrained in them. They will be taught by the Mother and older sisters, and see the example of the father behaving submissively (as well as older brothers).
Parents will have to explain that others in the outside world do not act this way in public, but that this behavior is correct within the privacy of the family. Within the home, it should be made clear that a whipping is the punishment for disobedience to Female Authority, including simply failing to please any Female, Mother of Sister.
The matter of actual sexual information should probably be delayed until later both for Daughters and for sons, just as most professionals would advise. For example, the Daughters would be initiated into whipping Their slave-father naked only when they are beginning to reach puberty. Mother explains it all to Them; father explains to the son that males wear restraints at the pleasure of those Females who are given specific authority and ownership of an individual male. At Her pleasure, the owned male obeys without question. If the Ladies of the family wish it, the young male may receive instruction from Them in the art of oral servitude.
All this may have to be a mere fantasy for most of us, and will be a schizophrenic madhouse in any case. But learning by example in the home, that this is the natural way to behave, is the most effective and probably the least pathological way of spreading the belief in gender superiority.
Posted by: bootlicker | June 2, 2012 1:53 PM