Trouble in the World of Phone Sex
» F/m Weblogs
This excerpt from From the Office of the Principal dovetails neatly with Domme Rip-Off Artists on the Web:
… Five or six weeks ago someone posted on another (private) PSO forum I belong to that there was a livejournal blog, supposedly written by a disaffected customer for the purpose of “outing” phone sex girls. The thing is, while disaffected customers do exist, what they are annoyed at is not a little phone fantasy, but being made fools of by internet “mistresses” who turn out to be less than young, beautiful, slender, and large-chested. They demand to be made fools of only by women who fit this description! In their minds, the fact that they themselves may be emotionally stunted trolls shouldn’t stand in the way of them finding a really hot mistress. But since they are ready to be made fools of, ready to commit their loyalty for life to a stranger no questions asked, guys like this often end up being the online submissives of guys posing as young women, as things are wont to go on the anonymous Internet.
The other group of “outers” is failed phone sex mistresses themselves, jealous that their lack of phone presence a/k/a acting ability keeps them from making the big phone bucks that girls with better acting, writing, design, and marketing skills can earn.
Within a few hours of the creation of the livejournal blog, there had been several entries “outing” a number of girls as “fake” - androids, I guess - and a slew of similar comments, clearly written by the same few people. The blog was not set up for default moderation of comments, so soon there were comments disputing things like the fact that the most famous “outed” girl only uses her own photos and does cam. Finally someone (again, anonymously, as all comments were) posted a list of the identites of those who were the likely suspects. Hey! I recognized their writing style in the inflammatory comments above. …
Speaking of Money Mistresses …


Comments
Dear Richard, If these disappointed male subs had any balls, they’d go along to a Munch/meet and get to know real players…but as you’ve said before - it’s mostly fantasy anyway. It’s also pretty shallow to complain that your phone Mistress isn’t Pamela Anderson’s PVC twin, when you won’t even cam or meet Her. If all they’re after is a virtual relationship, why not maintain the fantasy image? It smacks of “Poor me, poor me,” and excessive neediness - Again…
Posted by: Mistress Sky | August 30, 2006 4:13 AM
I think the issue here is that some subbie guys browse so many Femdom/fetish sites that most Dommes (non-pro) they would be able to meet in reality are quite tame in comparison, in both looks and fantasies. The women they meet can never live up to there huge expectations set up by these fantasy stories and fictional videos full of plastic women and improbable situations.
Posted by: Jack Crowley | August 30, 2006 10:35 AM
Actually I was more interested in Principal Quattrano’s (in this) and Angela St. Lawrence’s (in the earlier entry) remarks on the women who think putting up a second rate website with stolen material, a sneer and a wishlist make them competent online mistresses.
Domination - even at a distance and for pay - is a gift and a skill. It takes imagination and sweat like any other craft.
While I’ve never used a PSO I think good ones serve real need and deserve respect.
Posted by: Richard | August 30, 2006 3:37 PM