Stereotypes
» My Inner Life
In some of the debates about femdom stereotypes I find myself on middle ground. Clichιs are usually bad, especially if they become fixations you requires others match. But it would be wicked of me to fib and say there aren’t aspects of fetish attire that I don’t enjoy.
Where do they come from? Peter Tuper probably has some good ideas. I could easily manufacture something out of tissues of weak history plausible guesswork. Really the only question I’m competent to answer is how did I come to stock my own private library.
In elementary school I was fascinated by a girl with bright red hair. But don’t know if my admiration was even faintly erotic. Or even if she left me with a taste for red hair or merely marked my first conscious moment of enjoyment. (Whereas the silver suited David Bowie on the cover of Space Oddity assured its place in my sexual aesthetics.)
By Junior High I was keenly aware of physical beauty. I’ve never forgotten the golden haired boy on whom I had on of my first sexual crushes. And all the pretty girls. Unsurprisingly it was the girls whose biological clock operated in an earlier time zone that captured my eye.
Actually the boots are irrelevant for once. This reminds me of a time when I was innocent.
In popular culture - meaning TV mostly - there was Barbara Bain (glamor), Diana Rigg (perfection) and young Richard Chamberlain. And anything that smacked of Mod, Carnaby Street: the fashions of the time. Girls in miniskirts and boys with long hair.
My earliest BDSM fantasies were exclusively of guys. Guys in the neighborhood. No one in particular. Just the boys who were around me. The one specific fantasy I remember featured a guy who didn’t resemble anybody I knew. I was reading lots of comic books back then: he was probably assembled from generic illustrations. He was cruel: maybe a super-villain.
My sexual fantasy life then and since has mostly been populated by people seen on the street. My initial response to men dressed in leather was “Ugh!” All that macho paraphernalia did nothing for me. Jeans and a t-shirt seemed plenty sexy.
On discovering the attraction of female sadists I didn’t picture them in outfits from Dominatrix Deluxe. Aside from a proud bearing they were probably fashionably dressed. Pop culture at work again: fashion equals power.
Before that I do remember a drawing of a young women with a vest, whip and barbed wire for a belt. While the belt was clearly an insane idea it certainly suggested some sort of power. I like vests on women. A whip speaks for itself. While I felt a tingle I didn’t give that a thought and forgot about it
.Eventually I discovered the femdom usenet binaries newsgroup and gather countless images of female sadists. Eventually - in a manner of speaking - I entered the Other World Kingdom.
And for a time I was greatly fascinated by one of the OWK women. She wasn’t pretty. Not at all. But she looked like a heartless demon. Not sure what she wore.
To heck with the women. It is the appliances that count.
And I was far more interested in the OWK furniture and implements than what the women were wearing.
Since then I’ve seen lots and lots of stereotypic images of dominant women. I do like some of the garb. Thigh high boots? Sure. But, really, I like all sorts of stylized clothing. On women. On guys. No kink required.
And in fantasies I’ve never given much thought to what a dominant would be wearing. Ok, they always wear boots. In BDSM fantasies it is their attitude: arrogant, selfish, cruel - the usual shtick.
If I absorbed anything it would be stereotypes about behavior. Impossible torments. Really I brought those with me. Makers of porn don’t normally forge new tastes. They are corporations whose success is built on satisfying the urges their customers already have.
All the childish, cartoonish images that I had about BDSM can’t be blamed on anybody. Whether archetypes or stereotypes there were within me very early on.
Simpleminded images of sexuality are something many of us begin with. With maturity, experience a little thinking we scale them down and integrate them into ourselves more sensibly.
Earlier:


Comments
Historically, there’s a long list of domineering women, who could be read variously as arousing, horrifying or laughable. Before the French Revolution, there was a tradition of “libertine whores” in pornographic novels, who were adventurous and determined, and could argue materialist philosophy with the best of them. These heroines faded out of pornography after the revolution, though never entirely. (E.g. Rachilde’s Mary Barbe)
Culturally, I see the domina as a carnivalesque character, one who deliberately breaks social rules, and offers the potential for liberation. E.g. Sacher-Masoch made a kind of one-man religion out of the belief that ritually suffering at the hands of women will bring about spiritual renewal.
Sartorially, a lot of the accouterments associated with the stereotypical dominatrix were originally male attire, if you go back far enough, which emphasizes her gender transgression. She also represents the aristocrat, with undertones of both military authority and the leisure class.
Personally, I’m something of a classicist when it comes to fetish attire. It doest matter to me that the person is wearing the clothes, not that the clothes are wearing him or her. Ultimately, “character counts for a lot.”
Posted by: Peter Tupper | August 14, 2007 5:10 PM
I think my Domina stereotype is based around the look of an ex GF. Tall, long dark hair often worn in one of those extreme ponytails. A smile that bordered on the mischievous. Confident,a certain look in the eyes. Strangely I had usually been attracted to more of a girl next door look. Now I see someone similar to the above and think. “Oh Yeah”!
Posted by: Grumpy | August 18, 2007 6:16 PM
Oh, those smiles :) Whew!
I find ponytails very fetching myself.
I wouldn’t quite say girl next door myself. But any woman who would enjoy having power - the look hardly matters - it is her pleasure in the role.
Posted by: Richard | August 18, 2007 6:28 PM